Data-driven precision agricultural applications using field sensors and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

Rohit Pathak, Razieh Barzin, Ganesh C. Bora

Abstract


Abstract: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAVs) and crop sensors are the most widely used remote sensing tool in precision agriculture.  Use of UAVs in precision agriculture is attracting increasing interest due to its unique non-destructive approach.  In recent years, dramatic evolution of precision agriculture technology has been driven by technologies such as sensors and controllers, telematics, and UAVs.  An intriguing area in the field of precision agriculture and UAVs is big volume of data and its analysis that have not been dealt with in depth.  The objective of this study was to validate the crop data acquisition procedure and the crop relationship with different type of data acquisition technique.  In particular, this paper will compare ground based active optical sensor data collection with UAVs imagery for site-specificnitrogen management.  To accomplish these objectives randomized complete block plantation experimental design was used with four treatments and four replicates.  The plots were 12 rows wide at 38†spacing and were 125 ft. in length.  GreenSeeker field sensor and Micasense sensor for UAVs was used to evaluate the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index.  The software used to analyze the data were Microsoft®Excel® 2013, Statistical Analysis Software (ver.9.4) and ESRI ArcGIS (ver. 10.3).  The results showed that UAVs assessed NDVI are good indicator of crop nutrition along with the ground based crop sensors.  The result of the statistical data analysis showed that NDVI values are dependent on nitrogen application rate.  The average NDVI value for no nitrogen application was recorded 0.54 whereas for240 lb./acre nitrogen application it was noted to be 0.76.  Crucially, this correlation holds true for definite extent of nitrogen application rate.  Because there was not any significant change in NDVI for 160 lb./acre and240 lb./acre.  The NDVI values being 0.74 and 0.76 respectively.  The results are significant because it shows the potential of further validating the use of aerial imagery derived NDVI for real time application of crop nutrient.  This research has also proven that UAVs are reliable platform for nutrient assessment and making crop management decisions.

Keywords: Digital image, NDVI, Nitrogen, ground based sensor, crop

DOI: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0004

Citation:Pathak R, Barzin R, Bora G C. Data-driven precision agricultural applications using field sensors and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAVs). Int J Precis Agric Aviat, 2018; 1(1): 19 –23.


Full Text:

PDF word

References


Cambardella, C. A., Karlen, D. L. Spatial Analysis of Soil Fertility Parameters. Precision Agriculture, 1999; 1, 5–14. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023%2FA%3A1009925919134.pdf

Cook, S. E., Bramley, R. G. V. Precision agriculture— opportunities, benefits and pitfalls of site-specific crop management in Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1998; 38(7): 753–763.

Gomide, R. L., Inamasu, R. Y., Queiroz, D. M., Mantovani, E. C., Santos, W. F. An automatic data acquisition and control mobile laboratory network for crop production systems data management and spatial variability studies in the Brazilian center-west region. In 2001 ASAE Annual Meeting (p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.

Adamchuk, V. I., Hummel, J. W., Morgan, M. T., Upadhyaya, S. K. On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2004; 44(1): 71–91.

Wang, N., Zhang, N., Wang, M. Wireless sensors in agriculture and food industry—Recent development and future perspective. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2006; 50(1): 1–14.

Jenkins, D., Vasigh, B. The Economic Impact of Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in the United States. Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, 2013; (March), 1–40. Retrieved from http://www.auvsi.org/econreport

Atzberger, C. Advances in remote sensing of agriculture: Context description, existing operational monitoring systems and major information needs. Remote Sensing, 2013; 5(2): 949–981. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5020949

Kamilaris, A., Kartakoullis, A., Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 143(January): 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compag.2017.09.037

Sawant, M., Urkudeb, R., Jawale, S. Organized Data and Information for Efficacious Agriculture Using PRIDETM Model. International Food & Agribusiness Management Review, 2016; 19, 115–130. Retrieved from https://ifama.org/resources/Documents/v19ia/ 620150151.pdf

Jeppesen, J. H., Ebeid, E., Jacobsen, R. H., Toftegaard, T. S. Open geospatial infrastructure for data management and analytics in interdisciplinary research. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2018; 145(November 2017): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag. 2017.12.026

McBratney, A. B., Whelan, B., Ancev, T., Bouma, J. Future Directions of Precision Agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 2005; 6(July 2004), 7–23. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-005-0681-8

Yadav, R. Big Data Meets Small Sensors in Precision Agriculture. International Journal of Computer Applications, 2015; 1–4.

Řezník, T., Lukas, V., Charvát, K., Charvát, K., Křivánek, Z., Kepka, M., … Řezníková, H. Disaster Risk Reduction in Agriculture through Geospatial (Big) Data Processing. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2017; 6(8): 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6080238

Lan, Y. Bin, Chen, S. De, Fritz, B. K. Current status and future trends of precision agricultural aviation technologies. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017; 10(3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20171003.3088

Charvat, K., Kafka, S., Holy, S., Horak, P., Cepicky, J., Kocáb, M., Cajthaml, T. This is not a peer-reviewed article . Spatial Data Management. In Spatial Data Management, 2006; pp. 1–10. Retrieved from http://elibrary.asabe.org/azdez.asp?JID=1&AID=21960&CID=

canr2006&v=&i=&T=1&refer=7&access=&dabs=Y

Iftikhar, N., Pedersen, T. B. Flexible exchange of farming device data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011; 75(1): 52–63.

Kitchen, N. R., Snyder, C. J., Franzen, D. W., Wiebold, W. J. Educational needs of precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 2002; 3(4): 341–351.

Zhang, N., Wang, M., Wang, N. Precision agriculture—a worldwide overview. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2002; 36(2-3): 113–132.

Steinberger, G., Rothmund, M., Auernhammer, H. Mobile farm equipment as a data source in an agricultural service architecture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2009; 65(2): 238–246.

Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., Deering, D. W., Harlan, J. C. 1974. AND RETROGRADATION (GREENWAVE EFFECT) I OF NATURAL VEGETATION. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.464.7884&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Barnes, E., Clarke, T., Richards, S., Colaizzi, P., Haberland, J., Kostrzewski, M., … Moran, M. (n.d.). COINCIDENT DETECTION OF CROP WATER STRESS, NITROGEN STATUS AND CANOPY DENSITY USING GROUND-BASED MULTISPECTRAL DATA. Retrieved from https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/4190/PDF

Schut, A. G. T., Traore, P. C. S., Blaes, X., de By, R. A. Assessing yield and fertilizer response in heterogeneous smallholder fields with UAVs and satellites. Field Crops Research, 2018; 221(June 2017): 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.02.018

Zhou, X., Zheng, H. B., Xu, X. Q., He, J. Y., Ge, X. K., Yao, X., … Tian, Y. C. Predicting grain yield in rice using multi-temporal vegetation indices from UAV-based multispectral and digital imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2017; 130, 246–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.05.003

Costa, F. G., Ueyama, J., Braun, T., Pessin, G., Osorio, F. S., Vargas, P. A. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles and wireless sensor network in agricultural applications. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2012; 5045–5048. https://doi.org/10.1109/ IGARSS.2012.6352477

Reinecke, M., Prinsloo, T. The influence of drone monitoring on crop health and harvest size. 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications, NextComp 2017, 2017; 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/NEXTCOMP.2017.8016168

Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A., Drummond, S. T., Scharf, P. C., Palm, H. L., Roberts, D. F., Vories, E. D. Ground-based canopy reflectance sensing for variable-rate nitrogen corn fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 2010; 102(1): 71–84. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0114

Sharma, L. K., Bu, H., Denton, A., Franzen, D. W. Active-optical sensors using red NDVI compared to red edge NDVI for prediction of corn grain yield in north Dakota, U.S.A. Sensors (Switzerland), 2015; 15(11): 27832–27853. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151127832

Ratanoo, R., Kumar, S., Dhaka, A. K., Rolaniya, L. Precision Nitrogen Management Based on NDVI and in-Season Estimates of Response Index in Wheat, 2018; 7(4): 393–399.

Walsh, O. S., Shafian, S., Christiaens, R. J. Evaluation of Sensor-Based Nitrogen Rates and Sources in Wheat, 2018.

Mo-, A. T. N. Variable-Rate Nitrogen Fertilizer Application for Corn Using In-field Sensing of Leaves or Canopy, 2009; (August): 1–6.

Raun, W. R., Solie, J. B., Stone, M. L., Martin, K. L., Schepers, J. S., Johnson, G. V. Optical Sensor-Based Algorithm for Crop Nitrogen Fertilization *, 2005; (October 2004): 2759–2781. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00103620500303988


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.