Field evaluation of a Tri-Set spray nozzle for aerial application and discussion on release of biological control agents

Yanbo Huang, Steven J. Thomson

Abstract


Abstract: Efficiency and efficacy of aerial application of liquid formations has been studied extensively in terms of optimal nozzle/atomizer setups, adjuvant mixes, weather conditions, and aerial spray release heights.  In past studies, we have evaluated CP-11 flat-fan nozzles to assess impact factors of in-swath and downwind deposition from aerial spray application, and a solid stream radial Accu-Flo nozzle to determine penetration of the spray within crop canopy.  When applying liquid tank mixes from aerial platforms, there are numerous nozzle types available with differing spray characteristics.  More information is needed, however, on the ability of aerial delivery systems to effectively apply biological agents.  The release of non-toxigenic A. flavus into corn fields has shown promise as a biological control agent for aflatoxin producing strains of the fungus.  However, the application of a coarse granule to mature, two-meter-tall corn is a challenge.  Thus, there would be substantial advantages to a liquid formulation with necessary identification of appropriate adjuvants to disperse the highly hydrophobic spores of A. flavus.  This paper presents the experiment and preliminary data analysis of testing and evaluating Davidon tri-set nozzles under various nozzle configurations, and discusses what we need to know for effective use of different nozzles for potential application of biological control agents, especially Afla-Guard®, a commercially available product containing non-toxigenic A. flavus as a biological control agent, and related products into corn fields.

Keywords: aerial application, crop protection, nozzle evaluation, biological control agents

DOI: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20200302.75

 

Citation: Huang Y B, Thomson J S.  Field evaluation of a Tri-Set spray nozzle for aerial application and discussion on release of biological control agents.  Int J Precis Agric Aviat, 2020; 3(2): 40–47.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Huang Y, Brown M. Advancing to the next generation precision agriculture. In: Agriculture & Food Systems to 2050 – Global Trends, Challenges and Opportunities, 2018; Chapter 9, pp 285–314. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. doi: 10.1142/11212.

Fritz B, Gill M, Bretthauer S. Aerial application swath patterning: In-wind and cross-wind impacts. Journal of ASTM International, 2019; doi: 10.1520/STP161920180123.

Correa-Morales F, Dzul-Manzanilla F, Bibiano-Marín W, Vadillo-Sánchez J, Medina-Barreiro A, Martin-Park A, Villegas-Chim J, Elizondo-Quiroga A E, Lenhart A, Vazquez-Prokopec G M, Erales-Villamil J, Che-Mendoza A, Manrique-Saide P. Entomological efficacy of aerial ultra-low volume insecticide applications against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Mexico. Journal of Medical Entomology, 2019; 56(5): 1331–1337. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjz066.

Bretthauer S. Aerial applications in the USA. Outlooks on Pest Management, 2015; 26(5): 192–198. doi: 10.1564/v26_oct_02.

Moore A. A realistic look at UAVs and aerial application in agriculture. https://www.precisionag.com/in-field-technologies/drones-uavs/a-realistic-look-at-uavs-and-aerial-application-in-agriculture/, 2019; Accessed on Dec 9, 2019.

Moore A. Major corporate players embrace precision ag/aerial imaging. Agricultural Aviation, 2019; 46(4): 6–8.

Sato A. The RMAX Helicopter UAV. Public Report, Aeronautic Operations, 2003; Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan.

Zhou Z, Zang Y, Lu X, Lan Y, Xue X. Technology innovation development strategy on agricultural aviation industry for plant protection in China. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(24): 1–10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2013.24.001.

Kelemen D. The future of unmanned aircraft systems: is there a niche in aerial application? Agricultural Aviation, 2013; 9(10): 15–21.

Huang Y. Aerial application technology and remote sensing for developing sustainable agriculture. International Top-level Forum on Engineering Science and Technology Development Strategy - Precision Operating Equipment Technology. & International Conference on Intelligent Agriculture, 2020; Beijing, China Agriculture Press. In press.

Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K. Using laser diffraction to measure agricultural sprays: Common sources of error when making measurements. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 15–18. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0005.

Viera B, Butts T, Rodrigues A, Schleier J, Fritz B K, Kruger G. Particle drift potential of glyphosate plus 2,4 D Choline pre-mixture formulation in a low-speed wind tunnel. Weed Technology, 2020; doi: 10.1017/ wet.2020.15.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Establishing reference nozzles for classification of aerial application spray technologies. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1(1): 10–14. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0003.

Henry R, Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Kruger G. The influence of nozzle type, operating pressure, and tank-mixture components on droplet characteristics and the EPA's drift reduction rating. Journal of ASTM International, 2016; doi: 10.1520/STP159520150098.

Lan Y, Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Martin D E, Lopez J. Spray drift mitigation with spray mix adjuvants. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2008; 24(1): 5–10. doi: 10.13031/2013.24157.

Huang Y, Thomson S J. Characterization of in-swath spray deposition for CP-11TT flat-fan nozzles used in low volume aerial application of crop production and protection materials. Transactions of the ASABE, 2011; 54(6): 1973–1979. doi: 10.13031/2013.40645.

Huang Y, Thomson S J. Characterization of spray deposition and drift from a low drift nozzle for aerial application at different application altitudes. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2011; 4(4): 1–6. doi: 10.3965/j.issn.1934-6344.2011.04. 028-033.

Thomson S J. Evaluation of a solid stream radial nozzle on fixed-wing aircraft for penetration of spray within a soybean canopy. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2014; 54(1): 96–101. doi: 10.2478/jppr-2014-0015.

Vincelli P, Parker G, McNeill S. Aflatoxin in corn. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service, 1995; ID-59.

Abbas H K, Zablotowicz R M, Bruns H A, Abel C A. Biocontrol of aflatoxin in corn by inoculation with non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus isolates. Biocontrol Sci. Techn., 2006; 16: 437–449. doi: 10.1080/ 09583150500532477.

Abbas H K, Zablotowicz R M, Bruns H A. Modelling the colonisation of maize by toxigenic and non-toxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains: implications for biological control. World Mycotoxin Journal, 2008; 1(3): 333–340. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2008.x036.

Abbas H K, Zablotowicz R M, Horn B W, Phillips N A, Johnson B J, Jin X, Abel C A. Comparison of major biocontrol strains of non-aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus for the reduction of aflatoxins and cyclopiazonic acid in maize. Food Addit. Contam., 2011; 28: 198–208. doi: 10.1080/ 19440049.2010.544680.

Dorner J W, Horn B W, Cole R J. Non-toxigenic strain of Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus sojae for biocontrol of toxigenic fungi. United States Patent, Patent no. 6027724, Date of patent Feb. 22, 2000.

US EPA. Biopesticide Registration Action Document Aspergillus flavus (NRRL 21882) (PC code 006500), 2004.

Wright J F, Ibrahim N I. Steps of Water Dispersible Granule Development. Advances in Pesticide Formulation Technology, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, 1984; Vol. 254, Chapter 14, pp 185–192. doi: 10.1021/bk-1984-0254.ch014.

Jin X, Streett D A, Dunlap C A, Lyn M E. Application of hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB) number to optimize a compatible non-ionic surfactant for dried aerial conidia of Beauveria bassiana. Biol. Control, 2008; 46: 226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.03.008.

Jin X, Ugine T A, Chen J, Streett D A. Method for determining the best hydrophilic- lipophilic balance (HLB) number for a compatible non-ionic surfactant in formulation development for aerial conidia of Metarhizium anisopliae (Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae). Biocontrol Sci. Techn., 2009; 19: 341–347. doi: 10.1080/09583150902725893.

Weaver M A, Jin X, Hoagland R E, Boyette C D. Improved bioherbicidal efficacy by Myrothecium verrucaria via spray adjuvants or herbicide mixtures. Biol. Control, 2009; 50: 150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol. 2009.03.007.

Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C. Update to the USDA-ARS fixed-wing spray

nozzle models. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015; 58(2): 281–295. doi: 10.13031/trans.58.10896.

Zhu H, Salyani M, Fox R D. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution, 2011; 76: 38–43. doi: 10.1016/ j.compag.2011.01.003.

Richardson B, Kimberley M O, Gous S F. Defining acceptable levels of herbicide deposit variation from aerial spraying. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2004; 20: 259–267. doi: 10.13031/2013.16059.

ASABE. Standard S572.1: Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. St. Joseph, Michigan, USA: ASABE, 2009.

Jin X, Streett D, Huang Y, Ugine T. Development of a novel bioassay system to assess the effectiveness of entomopathogenic fungi against imported fire ants, Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2012; 22(2): 233–241. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2011.648166.

Jin X, Huang Y, Thomson S J, Elliott R B. Effects of conidial densities and spray volume of fungal suspensions of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana onconidial viability, droplet size and deposition coverage in bioassay using a novel bioassay spray system. Biocontrol Sci. Techn., 2013; 23(3): 362–366. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2012.758687.

Thomson S J, Young L D, Bright J R, Foster P N, Poythress D D. Effects of spray release height and nozzle/atomizer configuration on penetration of spray in a soybean canopy - preliminary results. Paper number AA07-008. National Agricultural Aviation Association, Washington, DC, 2007.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.