Monitoring of water stress in peanut using multispectral indices derived from canopy hyperspectral
Abstract
Abstract: Drought stress was a severe environmental constraint to peanut growth all over the world, and became more and more serious with the global warming context. So, timely and accurate monitoring of water status in peanut is important for farmer to irrigate promptly and acquire higher yield. Our study was conducted to select the most appropriate multispectral indices for water stress monitoring of two peanut cultivars based on canopy spectral reflectance in visible-infrared (VIS) and near infrared (NIR) region. The physiological parameters chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), chlorophyll content (SPAD) and leaf relative water content (LRWC) decreased as the drought stress level increased and showed significant relationships between each other. Decreases on the canopy spectral reflectance were observed in both cultivars, especially in NIR region (720-900 nm) as the leaf water loss was intensified. Six indices (RDVI, TCARI, OSAVI, TCARI/OSAVI, MTVI, and EVI-2) showed higher polynomial relationship (R2>R20.05, n=93) with the physiology parameters (Fv/Fm, SPAD and LRWC, respectively) based on the pooled data, which included the two cultivars, three drought stress treatments and the replications. After testing the above six sensitive indices under different drought stress, MTVI was the only multispectral indices, which showed significant curvilinear relationships with the three parameters under different drought stress conditions and might be a useful tool in the development of automatic systems. Our results may provide a non-destructive, simple and real-time method for water status monitoring in peanut production that can assist farmers in timely irrigation.
Keywords: Arachis hypogaea L., drought, canopy reflectance, monitor
DOI:Â 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20200303.104
Â
Citation: Chen T T, Wang L D, Qi H X, Wang X Y, Zeng R E, Zhu B Y, Lan Y B, Zhang L. Monitoring of water stress in peanut using multispectral indices derived from canopy hyperspectral.  Int J Precis Agric Aviat, 2020; 3(3): 50–58.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Varshney R K, Saxena R K, Upadhyaya H D, Khan A W, Yu Y, Kim C, Rathore A, Kim D, Kim J, An S, Kumar V, Anuradha G, Yamini K N, Zhang W, Muniswamy S, Kim J-S, Penmetsa R V, Wettberg E v, Datta S K. Whole-genome resequencing of 292 pigeonpea accessions identifies genomic regions associated with domestication and agronomic traits. Nature Genetics, 2017; 49: 1082–1088. doi.org/10.1038/ng.3872.
FAOSTAT. Available: http://faostat.fao.org/. 2014.
Akcay U C, Ercan O, Kavas M, Yildiz L, Yilmaz C, Oktem H A, Yucel M. Drought-induced oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in peanut (Arachishypogaea L.) seedlings. Plant Growth Regulation, 2010; 61: 21–28. doi.org/10.1007/s10725-010-9445-1.
Knapp A K, Briggs J M, Koelliker J K. Frequency and extent of water limitation to primary production in a mesic temperate grassland. Ecosystems, 2001; 4: 19–28. doi.org/10.1007/s100210000057.
Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature climate change, 2013; 3: 52–58. doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate1633.
Guo R, Shi L, Jiao Y, Li M, Zhong X, Gu F, Liu Q, Xia X, Li H. Metabolic responses to drought stress in the tissues of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB PLANTS, 2018; 10. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/ply016.
Basu S, Ramegowda V, Kumar A, Pereira A. Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Research, 2016; 5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1554.
Nanzad L, Zhang J, Tuvdendorj B, Nabil M, Zhang S, Bai Y. NDVI anomaly for drought monitoring and its correlation with climate factors over Mongolia from 2000 to 2016. Journal of Arid Environments, 2019; 164: 69–77. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.01.019.
Banks J M. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool to identify drought stress in Acer genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018; 155: 118–127. doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.022.
Li R, Guo P, Michael B, Stefania G, Salvatore C. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in barley. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2006; 5: 751–757. doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60120-X.
Egilla J N, Davies F T, Boutton T W. Drought stress influences leaf water content, photosynthesis, and water-use efficiency of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis at three potassium concentrations. Photosynthetica, 2005; 43: 135–140. doi.org/10.1007/s11099-005-5140-2.
Zhou C, Le J, Hua D, He T, Mao J. Imaging analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence induction for monitoring plant water and nitrogen treatments. Measurement, 2019; 136: 478–486. doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018. 12.088.
SalahvEl-Hendawy, Al-Suhaibani N, Hassan W, Tahir M, Schmidhalter U. Hyperspectral reflectance sensing to assess the growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat cultivars exposed to different irrigation rates in an irrigated arid region. PLoS One, 2017; 12:e0183262. doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0183262.
Li H, Dai S, Luo H. Status and prospects of agricultural drought monitoring. China Rural Technology, 2012; 5: 46–48. doi.org/10.1007/ s11442-016-1297-9.
Kim Y, Glenn D M, Park J, Ngugi H, Lehman B, 2011. Hyperspectral image analysis for plant stress detection. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 1009114. doi: 10.13031/ 2013.29814.
Gamon J A, Peñuelas J, Field C B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992; 41: 35-44. doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(92) 90059-S.
Roujean J-L, Breon F-M. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995; 51: 375-384. doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3.
Rouse J W, Haas R H, Schell J A, Deering D. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Fraden, S.C., Marcanti, E.P., Becker, M. A. (Eds.), Third ERTS-1 Symposium, 10–14 Dec. 1973, NASA SP-351, Washington D.C.. NASA. 1974: 309–317.
Haboudane D, Miller J R, Tremblay N, Zarco-Tejada P J, Dextraze L. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002; 81: 416–426. doi.org/10.1016/ S0034-4257(02)00018-4.
Zhen Z, Chen S, Qin W, Li J, Mike M, Yang B. A modified transformed soil adjusted vegetation index for cropland in Jilin Province, China. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 2019; 93: 173–176.
Mondal P. Quantifying surface gradients with a 2-band Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI2). Ecological Indicators, 2011; 11: 918–924. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.10.006.
Mishra A K, Singh V P. A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 2010; 391: 202–216. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012.
Barrs H, Weatherley P. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 1962; 15: 413-428. doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413.
Chen T, Zeng R, Guo W, Hou X, Yubin Lan, Zhang L. Detection of stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) caused by Aphids using leaf level hyperspectral measurements. Sensors (Basel), 2018; 18: 2798. doi.org/10.3390/s18092798.
Rouse J W, Haas R H, Schell J A, Deering D W. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. Proceedings of the Earth Resources Technology Satellite Symposium NASA SP-351, Washington, DC, USA, 1973; 1: 309–317.
Rougean J L, Breon F M. Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1995; 51: 375–384. doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(94)00114-3.
Daughtry C S T, Walthall C L, Kim M S, Colstoun E B D, Iii J M. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote sensing of Environment, 2000; 74: 229–239. doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00113-9.
Wu C, Niu Z, Gao S. The potential of the satellite derived green chlorophyll index for estimating midday light use efficiency in maize, coniferous forest and grassland. Ecological Indicators, 2012; 14: 66–73. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.018.
Penuelas J, Filella I, Lloret P, Munoz F, Vilajeliu M. Reflectance assessment of mite effects on apple trees. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1995; 16: 2727–2733. doi.org/10.1080/01431169508954588.
Gitelson A A, Viña A, Ciganda V, Rundquist D C, Arkebauer T J. Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005; 32: L08403. doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022688.
Blackburn G A. Quantifying chlorophylls and caroteniods at leaf and canopy scales: an evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998; 66 273–285. doi.org/10.1016/ S0034-4257(98)00059-5.
Gregory A Carter. Ratios of leaf reflectances in narrow wavebands as indicators of plant stress. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994; 15: 697–703. doi.org/10.1080/01431169408954109.
Neto A J S, Lopes D d C, Silva T G F d, Ferreira S O, Grossi J A S. Estimation of leaf water content in sunflower under drought conditions by means of spectral reflectance. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 2017; 10: 104–108. doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.11.006.
Gonfa A, Tesfaye K, Geleto T. Morphological and physiological attributes associated to drought tolerance of Ethiopian durum wheat genotypes under water deficit. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 2011; 1: 22–36.
Xu Q, Ma X, Lv T, Bai M, Wang Z, Niu J. Effects of water stress on fluorescence parameters and photosynthetic characteristics of drip irigation in rice. Water, 2020; 12 :289. doi.org/10.3390/w12010289.
Levitt J. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Volume II. Water, radiation, salt, and other stresses. Academic Press, 1980.
Gutierrez M, Reynolds M P, Klatt A R. Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2010; 61: 3291–3303. doi.org/10.1093/ jxb/erq156.
Ranjan R, Sahoo R N, Chopra U K, Pramanik M, Singh A K, Pradhan S. Assessment of water status in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using ground based hyperspectral reflectance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2017; 87: 377–388. doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0618-6.
Zygielbaum A I, Gitelson A A, Arkebauer T J, Rundquist D C. Non-destructive detection of water stress and estimation of relative water content in maize. Geophysical Research Letters, 2009; 36. doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038906.
Lin C, Popescu S C, Huang S C, Chang P T, Wen H L. A novel reflectance-based model for evaluating chlorophyll concentrations of fresh and water-stressed leaves. Biogeosciences, 2015; 12: 49–66.
Daughtry C S T, Walthall C L, Kim M S, Colstoun E B, McMurtrey J E. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000; 74: 229–239. doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00113-9.
Huang L, Zhang L, Zeng R, Wang X, Zhang H, Wang L, Liu S, Xuewen Wang, Chen T. Brassinosteroid priming improves peanut drought tolerance via eliminating inhibition on genes in photosynthesis and hormone signaling. Genes, 2020; 11: 919. doi.org/10.3390/genes11080919.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.