Deposition and biological efficacy of UAV-based low-volume application in rice fields
Abstract
Abstract: Efficient and accurate application of pesticides can improve biological efficacy, reduce insecticide resistance, and protect the environment. The rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) technology as a new method of pesticide application using low spray volumes demands scientific evaluation compared to conventional practices. The objective of this research was to analyze the effects of spray volume and tank-mix adjuvants on droplet deposition, canopy penetration, and control of rice blast disease and rice leaf roller when applied by UAV technology on rice. An electric backpack sprayer was used as the standard method of application for comparison. Increasing the spray volume and adding an adjuvant significantly increased droplet density, percentage of spray coverage, and control of rice blast and rice leaf roller for the UAV application. The control efficacy of the UAV sprayer was basically equal to or slightly worse than the backpack sprayer. These data indicate that a UAV application made at a spray volume of 18 L/hm2 with the addition of a methylated crop oil adjuvant at panicle initiation provided excellent blast and leaf roller control.
Keywords: UAV, adjuvant, biological efficacy, deposition, low-volume spray, rice
DOI:Â 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20200302.86
Â
Citation: Wang G B, Li X, Andaloro J, Chen P C, Song C C, Shan C F, et al.  Deposition and biological efficacy of UAV-based low-volume application in rice fields.  Int J Precis Agric Aviat, 2020; 3(2): 65–72.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Sharma A K, Sharma D, Chopra, A K. An overview of pesticides in the development of agriculture crops. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 2020; 12(2): 101–109. doi: 10.31018/jans.v12i2.2254.
Pan X L, Dong F S, Wu X H, et al. Progress of the discovery, application, and control technologies of chemical pesticides in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019; 18(4): 840–853. doi: 10.1016/ S2095-3119(18)61929-X.
Steadily increased of the use efficiency of fertilizer and pesticides, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China, December 18th 2019; http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/zwdt/201912/t20191218_6333443.htm.
del-Moral-MartÃnez I, Rosell-Polo J R, Uribeetxebarria A, et al. Spatially variable pesticide application in vineyards: Part I, developing a geostatistical approach, Biosystems Engineering, 2020; 195, 17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.04.014.
Foqué D, Braekman P, Pieters J G, et al. A vertical spray boom application technique for conical bay laurel (Laurus nobilis) plants. Crop Protection, 2012; 41, 113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.05.011.
Lan Y, Thomson S J, Huang Y, et al. Current status and future directions of precision aerial application for site-specific crop management in the USA, 2010; 74, 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.07.001.
Lan Y, Chen S. Current status and trends of plant protection UAV and its spraying technology in China. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation, 2018; 1, 1–9. doi: 10.33440/j.ijpaa.20180101.0002.
Qin W C, Qiu B J, Xue X Y, et al. Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers. Crop Protection, 2016; 85, 79–88. doi: 10.1016/ j.cropro.2016.03.018.
Wang G B, Lan Y B, Qi H X, et al. Field evaluation of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer, effect of spray volume on deposition and the control of pests and disease in wheat. Pest Management Science, 2019; 75(6), 1546–1555. doi: 10.1002/ps.5321.
Zhang P, Deng L, Lyu Q, et al. Effects of citrus tree-shape and spraying height of small unmanned aerial vehicle on droplet distribution. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2016; 9(4): 45–52. doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20160904.2178.
Zhang P, Wang K, Qiang L, et al. Droplet distribution and control against citrus leafminer with UAV spraying. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2017; 32(3): 299–307. doi: 10.2316/ Journal.206.2017.3.206-4980.
Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, et al. Effect of spray parameters of small unmanned helicopter on distribution regularity of droplet deposition in hybrid rice canopy. Transaction of the CSAE, 2016; 32(17): 40–46. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.17.006. (in Chinese)
Xue X Y, Tu K, Qin W C, et al. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2014; 7(4): 23–28. doi: 10.3965/ j.ijabe.20140704.003.
Qin W C, Xue X Y, Zhou L X, et al. Effect of spraying parameters of unmanned aerial vehicle on droplets deposition distribution of maize canopies. Transaction of the CSAE, 2014; 30(5): 50–56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.05.007.
Wang G, Han Y, Li X, Andaloro J, Chen P, Hoffmann W, Han X, Chen S, Lan Y. Field evaluation of spray drift and environmental impact using an agricultural unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) sprayer. Science of the Total Environment, 2020; 737: 139793. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139793.
Wang J, Lan Y, Zhang H, et al. Drift and deposition of pesticide applied by UAV on pineapple plants under different meteorological conditions. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2018; 11(6): 5–12. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20181106.4038.
Teske, M., Wachspress, D.A., Thistle, H.W. Prediction of aerial spray release from UAVs. Trans. ASABE, 2018; 61, 909–918. doi: 10.13031/trans.12701.
Spanoghe P, Schampheleire D M, Meeren P V d, et al. Influence of agricultural adjuvants on droplet spectra. Pest Management Science, 2007; 63(1): 4–16. doi:10.1002/ps.1321.
Wang C J, Liu, Z Q. Foliar uptake of pesticides-Present status and future challenge. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2007; 87(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.04.004.
Li J, Chen W, Xu Y, Wu X. Comparative effects of different types of tank-mixed adjuvants on the efficacy, absorption and translocation of cyhalofop-butyl in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli [L.] Beauv.). Weed Biology and Management, 2016, 16: 80–89. doi: 10.1111/ wbm.12095
Wang G B, Lan Y B, Yuan, H Z, et al. Comparison of spray deposition, control efficacy on wheat aphids and working efficiency in the wheat field of the unmanned aerial vehicle with boom sprayer and two conventional knapsack sprayers. Applied Science-Basel, 2019; 9(2), 218. doi: 10.3390/app9020218.
Chechi A, Roehrig R, Piton B, et al. The combined use of spray volumes and droplet sizes in the chemical control of Asian soybean rust in cultivars with different leaf area indices. Crop Protection, 2020; 136, 105212. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105212.
Knoche M. Effect of droplet size and carrier volume on performance of foliage-applied herbicides. Crop Protection, 1994; 13(3): 163–178. doi: 10.1016/0261-2194(94)90075-2.
Liao J, Zang Y, Luo X, et al. The relations of leaf area index with the spray quality and efficacy of cotton defoliant spraying using unmanned aerial systems (UASs),Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020; 169, 105228. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105228.
Fritz B K, Kirk I W, Hoffmann W C, et al. Aerial application methods for increasing spray deposition on wheat heads. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2006; 22 (3): 357–364. doi: 10.13031/2013.20453.
Zhu H, Salyani M, Fox, R D. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011; 76(1): 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.01.003.
Yuan H Z, Qi S H, Yang D B. Study on the point of run-off and the maximum retention of spray liquid on crop leaves. Chin Journal of Pesticide Science, 2000; 2(4): 66–71.
Ferguson J C, Hewitt A J, O'Donnell C C, et al. Comparison of water-sensitive paper, Kromekote and Mylar collectors for droplet deposition with a visible fluorescent dye solution. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 2020; 60(1): 98–105. doi: 10.24425/jppr.2020.132210.
Zhu H, Dorner J W, Rowland D L, et al. Spray penetration into peanut canopies with hydraulic nozzle tips. Biosystems Engineering, 2004; 87 (3): 275–283. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.11.012.
Derksen R C, Zhu H, Ozkan H E, et al. Determining the influence of spray quality, nozzle type, spray volume, and air-assisted application strategies on deposition of pesticides in soybean canopy. Transactions of the ASABE, 2008; 51: 1529–1537. doi: 10.13031/2013.25301.
Hanna H M, Robertson A E, Carlton M W, et al. Nozzle and carrier application effects on control of soybean leaf spot diseases. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2009; 25(1): 5–13. doi: 10.13031/ 2013.25424.
Ferguson J C, Chechetto R G, Hewitt A J, et al. Assessing the deposition and canopy penetration of nozzles with different spray qualities in an oat (Avena sativa L.) canopy. Crop Protection, 2016; 81: 14–19. doi: 10.1016/j. cropro.2015.11.013.
Spillman J J. Spray impactions, retention and adhesions: an introduction to basic characteristics. Pesticide science, 1984; 15(2): 97–106. doi: 10.1002/ps.2780150202.
Wolf R E and Daggupati N P. Nozzle type effect on soybean canopy penetration. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2009; 25: 23–30. doi: 10.13031/2013.25426.
Hilz E, Vermeer A W P. Spray drift review: The extent to which a formulation can contribute to spray drift reduction. Crop Protection, 2013; 44: 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.10.020.
Li X, Andaloro J, Lang, E., et al. 2019. Best management practices for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) application of insecticide products on rice. 2019 ASABE annual international meeting, Session of precision aerial spray applications: UAV/drones and manned aircraft, July 8th, 2019, Boston, Massachusetts. Paper No. 1901493. doi: 10.13031/aim.201901493.
Shengde C, Yubin L, Jiyu L, et al. Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2017; 10(3): 67–77. doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20171003.3078.
Chen P, Lan Y, Huang X, et al. Droplet deposition and control of planthoppers of different nozzles in two-stage rice with a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle. Agronomy, 2020; 10, 303. doi: 10.3390/ agronomy10020303.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.